Rationality & Responsibility

Christopher Roser discussed the concept of responsibility in his lecture, emphasizing its social dimensions, often overlooked in existing literature. In doing so, he introduced a more flexible perspective that allows for empirical studies in philosophical research on this subject.

The first part of his presentation delved into rationality, present several criticisms against the traditional, logic-focused view as rigid and indifferent to social aspects. Instead, he proposed a reasons- and argumentation-based approach, defining rationality as the capacity to adequately respond to reasons and arguments.

In the second part, the focus turned to moral responsibility and the justification of the principles of moral responsibility. While the reflective equilibrium method is currently prevalent, Roser suggested a social and interactive approach. According to this view, moral principles are justified through negotiation among various parties involved in the act of blaming, such as the perpetrator, the victim, and sympathizers.

In conclusion, the lecture emphasized that these novel approaches pave the way for incorporating empirical studies and evidence in philosophical discussions.